Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • About
    • About TREC
    • Advancing Equity
    • Our Staff
    • Our Researchers
    • Contact Us
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Media Coverage
  • Programs
    • Transportation Data
    • The Initiative for Bicycle and Pedestrian Innovation
    • TREC Resource Hub
    • PacTrans
    • Better Block PSU
    • Workforce Development
    • National Institute For Transportation And Communities
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Transportation Seminars
    • BikePed Training
    • Summer High School Camp
    • Ann Niles Lecture
    • Past Events
  • Research and Data
    • Research Areas
    • Researchers
    • All Projects
    • Final Reports
    • PORTAL: Portland-Vancouver
    • BikePed Portal: National
    • For Researchers
  • Study at PSU
    • Why Study at PSU?
    • Degrees and Courses
    • STEP Student Group
    • Graduate Research Assistants
    • Scholars
    • Sustainable Transportation Study Abroad
User account menu
  • Log in

Institutional and Technology Options for VMT Data and Fee Collection Centers

Principal Investigator:

Anthony Rufolo, Portland State University


Summary:

The objective of this report is an analysis of public vs. private data and fee collection centers for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) fees. This includes the identification and evaluation of issues that will affect the relative desirability of the two forms of ownership and operation. These issues include cost, enforcement, debt collection, flexibility, and public perception. There are a variet... The objective of this report is an analysis of public vs. private data and fee collection centers for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) fees. This includes the identification and evaluation of issues that will affect the relative desirability of the two forms of ownership and operation. These issues include cost, enforcement, debt collection, flexibility, and public perception. There are a variety of issues that must be addressed in evaluating public or private provision of a government service. In general, competitive private provision of a service is likely to be less costly and more innovative than direct government provision; but direct provision provides more continuity and avoids some potential problems with contract incentives and changes in service providers. It is also important to separate the source of differences in cost between direct government provision and contracted private provision of a service. An additional consideration is whether the government is choosing a single provider or is setting up a system that allows for multiple possible private providers, competing with each other for customers. For example, in trash collection some governments provide direct service, some contract with a single provider for the service, and some allow multiple private providers to compete to provide the service. The choice between the latter two forms of private provision is likely to be affected by issues such as economies of scale, privacy concerns, and enforcement. See More

Project Details

Project Type: Research
Project Status: Completed
End Date: December 31, 2002

Downloadable Products

  • Institutional and Technology Options for VMT Data and Fee Collection Centers (FINAL_REPORT)

 

© 2024 | Transportation Research and Education Center | 503-725-8545 | asktrec@pdx.edu